Randwick-Kensington R2

13:25TAB Mdn Plate
1150mMaidenHeavy 9Rail: +4m
Races1234567
Model rankingsall runners · unfiltered
ConsensusOur key selections. A pick only appears when multiple models that we use agree on the same top selection — the highest-performing signal we publish. We only bet if we can get the Target price (20% above our Fair price) or better. Early prices shown here are a guide only. We reconcile our results only on those selections where the bookmaker SP is above the target price. You should make your own assessment if these selections fit your betting profile and never bet what you aren't prepared to lose. Our models aren't perfect, don't expect our selections to be.Entropy2.85top 3
Ranked 1st
6. Claudel
Chad Schofield (10)
Fair
$4.08
Target
$4.90
Mkt
$3.80
Ranked 2nd
5. Rapid Revenue
Tim Clark (4)
Fair
$4.78
Target
$5.74
Mkt
$18.00
Ranked 3rd
10. Ready Forcocktails
Tyler Schiller (6)
Fair
$4.78
Target
$5.74
Mkt
$3.00
FairThis is our model's price for this horse, any odds above this are considered good value.
TargetThe minimum price to bet — 20% above Fair. Only back this runner at the Target price or longer.
MktMarket price as @ 08:35 AEST.
SP — Official Bookmaker Starting Price
EntropyA score that reflects how contested a race is based on the model's predicted results. Lower the better, ≤ 2.7 is considered a good clear indicator.
Predicted speed mapback → finish →
No data2
no recent settle
5 Rapid Revenue(4)
8 Glissando(7)
Backmarkers1
settle 11+
2 Gondorff(9)
Midfield1
settle 7–10
9 Novel Attraction(2)
On-pace4
settle 3–6
4 Pierro Lad(1)
1 Creator Of World(3)
11 Sorentina(8)
6 Claudel(10)
Leaders2
pushing for the lead
3 Pharland(5)
10 Ready Forcocktails(6)

Speed map

There is genuine pressure on paper because 3. Pharland and 10. Ready Forcocktails all have recent patterns that put them right at the head of the race. With 4 more capable of holding a handy spot, the front third should be busy rather than cosy. That makes the first 400 metres important: if the leaders keep each other working, the race becomes more attractive for the stalking and midfield bands than for a pure speed horse trying to pinch it. The map is therefore less about a full-field roll call and more about which runners can own the first half without spending too much petrol. The unknown-speed runners 5. Rapid Revenue and 8. Glissando add some uncertainty, but they have not earned a forward label from the available settling evidence.

The tactical pressure points are specific. 1. Creator Of World, 4. Pierro Lad, 6. Claudel and 11. Sorentina need to find cover or rhythm before the race settles, while 2. Gondorff will be relying on the leaders and pressers to bring them into it. The published pick, where present, has to be judged against those lanes rather than its name alone; a good draw helps only if it lets the horse occupy the part of the race the track has been rewarding.

Historical overview

The broad 1150m sample says the trip has been shaped by 1–3, with 7 wins and A/E 1.24. That is the starting point, not the finish, because today's going and rail can shift the winning lane. There is no stronger going-and-rail sample than the base 1150m profile, so the historical read is useful but should be softened for today's exact conditions.

In the relevant sample, 1–3 is the clearest historical zone, while inside (1–4) is the strongest barrier pointer. Market-wise, the most reliable band has been pop ($2–5) with 6 wins and A/E 0.93; that keeps the race price-sensitive rather than a blind favourites-only setup. The sample sizes are not huge in some of these subgroups, but the lane is still decision-relevant when it lines up with the map.

  • The key settling lane is 1–3 — 7 wins from 9 races in the 1150m sample, A/E 1.24, which points to 3. Pharland, 10. Ready Forcocktails and 4. Pierro Lad.
  • Barrier shape matters — inside (1–4) has 6 wins and A/E 1.0, so 1. Creator Of World, 4. Pierro Lad, 5. Rapid Revenue and 9. Novel Attraction get the draw-side tick.
  • Human-factor note — jockey Siena Grima brings a 30 race track sample at A/E 1.73 for 8. Glissando, a useful support but not enough by itself to override the map.

Overall assessment

The race should be decided by how cheaply the first wave gets across and whether the historical lane is close enough to the actual pace shape. On this map, 3. Pharland and 10. Ready Forcocktails are the runners that control the early picture, while 9. Novel Attraction are the ones waiting for any over-racing or wide working in front of them. The more the race is run at an even tempo, the more the draw and settle-row evidence matter.

Key chances:

  • #4 Pierro Lad — lands around settler #3 in the 1–3 band, the lane carrying 7 wins and A/E 1.24 in the relevant sample. From barrier 1, that is a workable profile if the race develops as mapped.
  • #10 Ready Forcocktails — lands around settler #2 in the 1–3 band, the lane carrying 7 wins and A/E 1.24 in the relevant sample. From barrier 6, that is a workable profile if the race develops as mapped. Trainer m, w & j hawkes has a 28 race track sample at 21.4% and a/e 1.27; jockey tyler schiller has a 37 race track sample at 18.9% and a/e 1.2 adds a secondary tick.
  • #3 Pharland — lands around settler #1 in the 1–3 band, the lane carrying 7 wins and A/E 1.24 in the relevant sample. From barrier 5, that is a workable profile if the race develops as mapped.

The published models have not flagged a runner here. That leaves the race to be played from map, draw and the historical lanes rather than forcing a bet around a named model pick. My read is anchored to the horses that combine a usable map with the strongest historical lane; if that differs from the published pick, the difference is map-based rather than a knock on the horse. The concrete risk is that an unknown or mixed-pattern runner is ridden more aggressively than its available evidence suggests, which would change the pressure profile before the first turn.

For betting purposes, this is not a simple fastest-horse exercise. The usable edge is in matching each runner's likely early position to the part of the track and field that has converted before, then demanding the right price when a runner is forced away from that lane. That is especially important on affected ground, where a small change in tempo can turn a historical advantage into a tactical trap.

This write up was completed using AI. We prompt it with extensive real race data and actively manage parts of the output. We are actively reviewing and refining these prompts, if you have feedback about these commentaries, please send us a message to hello@hoofmetrics.com.Generated by StopWatch (gpt-5.5).

Distance stats

Distance
1150m · 9 races (9 winners)

Barrier draw

RunsWins% WinSRA/E
Inside (1–4)32666.7%18.8%1.00
Middle (5–9)25333.3%12%0.67
Wide (10+)100%0%0.00

Settling position

RunsWins% WinSRA/E
Leaders (1–3)27777.8%25.9%1.24
On-pace (4–6)25111.1%4%0.25
Midfield (7–10)6111.1%16.7%1.09

Market (SP)

RunsWins% WinSRA/E
Odds-on (≤$2)3222.2%66.7%1.17
Pop ($2–5)21666.7%28.6%0.93
Mid ($5–10)1100%0%0.00
Roughie (>$10)23111.1%4.3%0.96