Emerald R3

14:17AAA Tilt Tray Towing Plate (C3)
1280mClass 3Soft 5Rail: True
Races1234567
Model rankingsall runners · unfiltered
ConsensusOur key selections. A pick only appears when multiple models that we use agree on the same top selection — the highest-performing signal we publish. We only bet if we can get the Target price (20% above our Fair price) or better. Early prices shown here are a guide only. We reconcile our results only on those selections where the bookmaker SP is above the target price. You should make your own assessment if these selections fit your betting profile and never bet what you aren't prepared to lose. Our models aren't perfect, don't expect our selections to be.Entropy3.01top 3
Ranked 1st
8. Stecara
Paul Hamblin (2)
Fair
$4.49
Target
$5.39
Mkt
$8.00
Ranked 2nd
7. Smashing Rosie
Matthew Gray (5)
Fair
$5.31
Target
$6.37
Mkt
$3.70
Ranked 3rd
4. I'm Stellar
Emma Bell (6)
Fair
$8.50
Target
$10.20
Mkt
$6.50
FairThis is our model's price for this horse, any odds above this are considered good value.
TargetThe minimum price to bet — 20% above Fair. Only back this runner at the Target price or longer.
MktMarket price as @ 08:30 AEST.
SP — Official Bookmaker Starting Price
EntropyA score that reflects how contested a race is based on the model's predicted results. Lower the better, ≤ 2.7 is considered a good clear indicator.
Predicted speed mapback → finish →
Backmarkers0
settle 11+
Midfield3
settle 7–10
2 Tapa Kick(4)
7 Smashing Rosie(5)
3 Armstrong Bay(7)
On-pace4
settle 3–6
8 Stecara(2)
5 Lunar Eight(3)
4 I'm Stellar(6)
9 Monday Choice(8)
Leaders2
pushing for the lead
1 Bigcat(1)
6 Notforthemoney(9)

Speed map

Bigcat is listed as the lead runner but has no confirmed settling evidence, so the more reliable speed comes from Notforthemoney, with I'm Stellar, Lunar Eight and Stecara close behind. Monday Choice can also settle handy. The map therefore has enough forward horses to be solidly run, but Bigcat's unconfirmed profile adds uncertainty to who actually controls.

The race file carries no pre-race pick in its selections field. The 1280m Emerald rail sample is small but usable, and it leans to the first three rather than the deeper runners. That keeps Notforthemoney and I'm Stellar central to the read. Armstrong Bay, Tapa Kick and Smashing Rosie settle in the 7-10 row, which has been winless in the usable sample, so they need a much stronger tempo than the map necessarily promises.

Historical overview

The usable 1280m rail sample has only five races, so confidence is moderate, but the pattern is at least clear: winners have been concentrated near the front and the deeper row has not fired. The soft-condition slice is thinner and not usable, so the rail/distance sample is the main guide.

First-three settlers have 3 wins from 12 at A/E 1.06, the 4-6 group is 1 from 9 at A/E 0.76, and 7-10 is 0 from 5. Barrier data is not decisive, with inside and middle both below one. The market has been strongest at the top in a tiny sample and has not rewarded roughies.

  • Front-half runners hold the edgeBigcat, Notforthemoney and I'm Stellar are in the first-three row.
  • Deep runners are undercutArmstrong Bay, Tapa Kick and Smashing Rosie sit in a winless 7-10 row.
  • Emma Bell is a positive angle — she rides I'm Stellar, adding support to a map-positive runner.

Overall assessment

Notforthemoney looks the dependable pace influence, with Bigcat a possible leader if his unconfirmed map call proves right. I'm Stellar should be right on their backs, and Lunar Eight and Stecara make the first six competitive. Unless Bigcat and Notforthemoney turn it into a serious duel, the race shape favours the front half.

Key chances:

  • #4 I'm Stellar — maps in the first-three row and gets the Emma Bell angle; she can stalk the lead rather than absorb all the pressure.
  • #6 Notforthemoney — the clearest exposed leader and in the strongest practical row; he is the horse that can make the race.
  • #1 Bigcat — a cautious inclusion: the lead call is unconfirmed, but if he does use barrier 1 to hold the first three, the historical lane supports him.

The race file carries no pre-race pick. My read is against the deeper midfielders unless the two pace influences overdo it. With the 7-10 row winless in the usable sample, closers need a clear race-shape excuse.

This write up was completed using AI. We prompt it with extensive real race data and actively manage parts of the output. We are actively reviewing and refining these prompts, if you have feedback about these commentaries, please send us a message to hello@hoofmetrics.com.Generated by StopWatch (gpt-5.5).

Distance stats

Distance
1280m · 5 races (5 winners)

Barrier draw

RunsWins% WinSRA/E
Inside (1–4)20360%15%0.80
Middle (5–9)15240%13.3%0.89
Wide (10+)200%0%0.00

Settling position

RunsWins% WinSRA/E
Leaders (1–3)12360%25%1.06
On-pace (4–6)9120%11.1%0.76
Midfield (7–10)500%0%0.00
Unknown11120%9.1%0.81

Market (SP)

RunsWins% WinSRA/E
Odds-on (≤$2)1120%100%1.85
Pop ($2–5)11240%18.2%0.57
Mid ($5–10)10240%20%1.44
Roughie (>$10)1500%0%0.00